"Water for Elephants"
"Water for Elephants" |
Excellent movies based on books are usually very good, often generating Oscar buzz months before release. Unfortunately , Water for Elephants , not one of those movies. The film, based on a novel by Sara Gruen, is not bad by any means, but do not fold into the eyes of everyone.
, Water for Elephants , said James Jankowski (Robert Pattinson), a student whose parents die, let orphaned and abandoned. After the launching of the circus train, which connects the company changed Jacob and veterinarian. To attract a large audience, taking over the head of the circus, August (Christoph Waltz) is an elephant named Rosie Marlena sequence stars (Reese Witherspoon), who turn to the assembly, the wife of August. Jacob is to help train the elephant, with the help of Marlene suggested no violent measures in August. more closely with their love Rosita, Jacob and Marlena though August.
Water for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for ElephantsWater for Eleph
The story is very interesting, very nicely thank you so at Gruen and film. The camera work is impressive and stunning photos of the increased memory circus life exciting.
The main problem in the film comes from his work, notably a portrait of Robert Pattinson Jacob. After Twilight and its consequences have not been Pattinson hopes to high. This means that played in the film suggests that there has been an improvement. Unfortunately it is not. As expected, was more than a publicity stunt to give than a commentary on their performance. Throughout the film, Pattinson is difficult and inconvenient, leading to a flat image circus vet.
Fortunately, the Oscar-winning actor Christoph Waltz shops of the film. His interpretation of the circus is Cooler disturbed and aggressive. Without them, the film will be very little, lest the audience interested. Although Witherspoon also manages to keep viewers engaged, their performance is nothing to celebrate.
Usually , Water for Elephants is a good and funny movie. The picture is beautiful, the story is interesting, elephant, it is nice and gives a very Vals performance. This means that the film is boring. Pattinson hard power as the most important decreases the quality of the movie. Pattinson should keep fighting vampires and werewolves and trim for more skilled workers into action.